Zum Hauptinhalt springen
All industries Risk: mittel

Cleaning & Drugstore: Greenwashing Risk 2026

The cleaning and drugstore sector is particularly at risk of warnings due to the multitude of environmental claims and the direct targeting of environmentally conscious consumers. The EmpCo Directive (EU 2024/825) significantly tightens the requirements for transparency and substantiation of environmental claims from 27 September 2026. In particular, generic claims such as "environmentally friendly", "natural" or "biodegradable" without concrete substantiation violate Annex I No. 2 of the UCPD as amended by EmpCo and can lead to warnings. The BGH ruling of 27 June 2024 (I ZR 98/23 – Katjes) has already established that in the food sector "climate-neutral" without transparent disclosure of CO2 calculation and offsetting is misleading. This principle can be transferred by analogy to the cleaning and drugstore sector. The claim "climate-neutral" is from 2026 fundamentally inadmissible due to the per se ban in Annex I No. 4a UCPD as amended by EmpCo, even if CO2 offsetting takes place. In order to advertise in a legally compliant manner, it is essential to rely on recognised certificates such as the EU Ecolabel or the Blauer Engel and to provide these with the corresponding licence number. The mere use of buzzwords without substantiation is not sufficient and can lead to competition law consequences. In addition, a complete and correct INCI list (INCI nomenclature) on the packaging is mandatory to ensure transparency for consumers. The indication of the test standard for biodegradability (e.g. OECD 301) is also essential to substantiate the claim "biodegradable".

Typical claims in Cleaning & Drugstore

  • bio-cleaner"
  • natural ingredients"
  • environmentally friendly"
  • biodegradable"
  • plastic-free"

Concrete examples (red/amber)

  • "Natural cleaner" with synthetic fragrances and preservatives
  • "Biodegradable" without indication of test standard (e.g. OECD 301)
  • "Environmentally friendly packaging" made from non-recycled plastic

EmpCo-compliant alternatives

Instead of: Bio-Cleaner"
Better: Cleaner with 99% ingredients of natural origin, certified to EU Ecolabel"
Why: "Bio" is not legally defined and is generic. Specific indication of the natural content and certification required.
Instead of: Environmentally Friendly Packaging"
Better: Packaging made from 100% recycled PET (rPET)"
Why: "Environmentally friendly" is an inadmissible, generic claim. Specific information on material and recycled content is required.

Recommendations

  • Provide EU Ecolabel certification with licence number
  • Provide Blauer Engel certification with licence number
  • Complete INCI list (INCI nomenclature) on the packaging
  • Specific information on biodegradability according to OECD standards (e.g. OECD 301)
  • Use of recycled plastic or refillable systems

Recognised certificates

EU Ecolabel
EU-wide recognised environmental label for products and services with low environmental impact.
Blauer Engel RAL-UZ
German environmental label for environmentally friendly products and services.
Cradle to Cradle
Certification for products that are managed in a closed loop.

Relevant court rulings

BGH · I ZR 98/23 · 2024
Katjes — "climate-neutral" without transparent disclosure of CO2 calculation and offsetting is misleading under § 5 UWG. Transferable by analogy to cleaning and drugstore products.

Frequently asked questions

May I continue to use "biodegradable"?

Yes, but only with indication of the test standard (e.g. OECD 301). A mere claim is inadmissible under EmpCo and UWG.

What does the EmpCo Directive mean for my cleaning and drugstore products?

From 27.09.2026, generic claims without substantiation (Annex I No. 2 UCPD) are prohibited. "Climate-neutral" is no longer permissible due to the per se ban (Annex I No. 4a UCPD).

Is your Cleaning & Drugstore website affected?

Free check — know within 30 seconds.

Check now