Zum Hauptinhalt springen
All industries Risk: hoch

Fashion & Textiles: Greenwashing Risk 2026

The fashion industry is particularly in the crosshairs following EmpCo: H&M, Decathlon and Zalando were repeatedly reprimanded for greenwashing between 2022-2024. The Dutch Consumer Protection Authority ACM completely banned H&M's "Conscious Choice" collection in 2023 — a model for consumer protection authorities in DE/AT/CH. From 27 September 2026, all generic environmental claims without concrete, measurable proof are considered misleading under § 5 UWG as amended — regardless of whether on product labels, in online shops or in advertising.

Typical claims in Fashion & Textiles

  • sustainable collection"
  • eco fashion"
  • environmentally friendly materials"
  • fairly produced"
  • conscious"
  • green line"
  • recycled fibres"
  • climate-neutral T-shirt"
  • low-water dyeing"
  • circular fashion"

Concrete examples (red/amber)

  • 'Sustainable Collection' (H&M) without GOTS certificate — reprimanded by the Dutch ACM in 2022
  • 'Eco-friendly T-shirt' with 20% recycled polyester (remainder virgin) without percentage disclosure
  • 'Conscious' — generic term without measurable criterion
  • 'Climate-neutral shirt' through planting instead of own emission reduction
  • 'Made in Europe' for garments made in Bangladesh with final finishing in Portugal

EmpCo-compliant alternatives

Instead of: Sustainable Collection"
Better: GOTS-certified (CU 821537), 95% organic cotton from India, manufactured at Tirupur Fashions (Fair Wear audit score: Good)"
Why: Generic term replaced by concrete certification + proportion + supply chain.
Instead of: Eco-friendly T-shirt made from recycled polyester"
Better: 65% recycled polyester (GRS-certified, post-consumer PET bottles), 35% virgin polyester"
Why: Proportion must be stated in percentages, recycling source named.
Instead of: Conscious — consciously manufactured"
Better: OEKO-TEX 100 Class II tested, water consumption per shirt reduced from 2,700 l to 1,100 l (own LCA, 2024)"
Why: Vague marketing term replaced by measurable technical specification.
Instead of: Climate-neutral T-shirt"
Better: CO₂ footprint reduced by 38% (Scope 1+2, 2024 vs. 2020), remaining emissions offset via Verified Carbon Standard projects"
Why: EmpCo Annex I No. 4a — reduction and offsetting clearly separated.

Recommendations

  • GOTS certificate with licence number (CU XXXXXX) and proportion of certified cotton
  • OEKO-TEX Standard 100 with test number and class (I-IV)
  • Material composition with percentages (e.g. '60% organic cotton, 40% recycled polyester')
  • Production locations (country, city, factory name) in footer or on product page
  • Fair Wear Foundation or Fairtrade Cotton instead of generic claims

Recognised certificates

GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)
Organic natural fibres + social minimum standards, licence number CU XXXXXX verifiable.
OEKO-TEX Standard 100
Harmful substance testing with test number and class (I for baby, II for skin-contact).
GRS (Global Recycled Standard)
Verified recycled content and supply chain.
Fair Wear Foundation
Membership with audit score (Leader/Good/Improver).
Bluesign
Resource-efficient production (water, chemicals, air).
Cradle to Cradle Certified
Circular economy certificate in 5 levels.

Frequently asked questions

May I advertise 'recycled' on a T-shirt?

Only with percentage disclosure and source information. Example: '65% recycled polyester (GRS-certified)' is permitted, 'made from recycled material' alone is not. The EU Ecolabel requires at least 80% recycled material to advertise as 'recycled'.

Is 'Made in Europe' a greenwashing claim?

Not per se, but misleading if only the final assembly takes place in Europe. According to Art. 60 UZK: Made-in country = last substantial processing or working. In fashion this is often abused — e.g. fabric from Bangladesh, sewing in Portugal = legally 'Made in EU', but misleading.

What does 'circular fashion' mean legally?

Legally, 'circular' is not defined — therefore prohibited without substantiation (EmpCo Annex I No. 4). Anyone wishing to use the term must provide measurable circularity indicators: % recycled material, take-back programme, repair service, life cycle analysis (LCA).

Is a single organic cotton shirt in the collection sufficient for 'sustainable collection'?

No — and that was the core of the ACM proceedings against H&M (2023). If the collection is advertised as 'sustainable', the minimum standards must apply to all items in the collection, not just to individual hero pieces.

How high are the warning costs in the fashion industry?

On average €2,500-8,000 per violation, considerably more for repeat offences. ACM fine against H&M (NL): €250,000. The Wettbewerbszentrale issued over 80 warnings for greenwashing in the fashion industry in 2024.

Is your Fashion & Textiles website affected?

Free check — know within 30 seconds.

Check now